Day of Wrath (Danish: Vredens Dag) is a dark and white film, made in 1943, by Danish director Carl Theodor Dreyer. The film is an adaptation of Anne Pedersdotter (1909) by the Norwegian playwright Hans Wiers-Jenssen, based on an actual Norwegian case in the sixteenth century.

Plot

Day of Wrath is set in a Danish village in 1623 where an old woman Herlof’s Marte (Anna Svierkier) is accused of witchcraft. Anne (Lisbeth Movin), a young woman, has been married since childhood to the aged local pastor, Absalon Pedersson (Thorkild Roose), who is involved with the trials of witches, and they live in a house shared with his strict domineering mother Meret (Sigrid Neiiendam). Meret does not approve of Anne, much younger than her husband, being about the same age as the son from his first marriage. Anne gives Herlof’s Marte refuge, but Marte is soon discovered in the house, though she is presumed to have hidden herself there without assistance. Herlof’s Marte knows that Anne’s mother, already dead at the time of the events depicted, had been accused of witchcraft as well, and had been spared thanks to Absalon’s intervention, who aimed at marrying young Anne. Anne is thus informed by Herlof’s Marte of her mother’s power over people’s life and death, and become intrigued in the matter.

The son, Martin (Preben Lerdorff Rye) returns home from abroad and he and Anne are immediately attracted to one another; she does not love her husband and considers him not to love her. Under heavy torture Herlof’s Marte confesses to witchcraft, defined among other evidence as wishing for the death of other people, but threatens to expose Anne if Absalon does not rescue her from a guilty verdict, begging him to save her like he saved Anne’s mother. Marte though, after pleading with Absalon a second time, does not betray his secret and is burned at the stake with the villagers looking on. Absalon feels his guilt over having saved Anne’s mother, but leaving Marte to burn. Anne and Martin, clandestinely growing closer, are seen as having changed in recent days, fuelling Meret’s suspicion of Anne’s character. Anne is heard laughing in Martin’s company by her husband, something which had not occurred in their time together. Absalon regrets that he took Anne’s hand disregarding her feeling and true intentions, and tells her so, apologising for stealing her youth and happiness.

A violent storm erupts while Absalon is away visiting a dying young parishioner Laurentius (Olaf Ussing); he had been cursed by Herlof’s Marte during her interrogation and foretold an imminent death. Meanwhile, Anne and Martin are discussing the future, and she is forced to admit wishing her husband dead, but only as an “if” rather than it actually happening. At that moment Absalon, on his way home, feels “like the touching of death itself”. On Absalon’s return, Anne confesses her love for Martin to her husband and tells him she wishes him dead; he collapses and dies calling Martin’s name. Anne screams. The following morning Martin is overcome by his own doubts, despite Anne claiming that she had nothing to do with his father’s death which she sees a providential help from above to release her from her present misery and unhappy marriage. At Absalon’s funeral, Anne is denounced by Meret, her mother-in-law, as a witch. Anne initially denies the charge, but when Martin sides with his grandmother she is faced with the loss of his love and trust, and confesses on her husband’s open coffin (bier) that she murdered him and enchanted his son with the Devil’s help. Her fate appears sealed.

Watch full Movie –

Earthquake hits off Hawaii’s coast

A 4.4-magnitude earthquake struck Hawaii on Monday evening, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

I have explained this before but I’m going to explain it again.  Part of the thesis, that I have were on all my life, is based upon a theory that was first postulated by Wolfgang Pauli.  It was then advanced by Adrian Dobbs.  And was even used, in part, by Dr. JB Rhine of Duke University.  The theory, or thesis, deals with multidimensional particle sequencing and particle acceleration.  And as these processes relate to and interact with neutrinos and psitron’s, pursuant to information processing and meteorologically displayable events.  Now the Wolfgang Pauli theory of multidimensionality, regarding sub particle sequencing and particle accelerations, is not one that is very popular with quantum physicists and quantum mechanics.  Part of the reason is because of multidimensionality of the sub particle sequencing and sub particle accelerations as they relate to Neutrionic and psitronic behavior.  And of course I don’t expect anyone connected with the national geophysical survey team under any circumstances to really understand the nature of Neutrionic or psitronic behavior pursuant to sub particle sequencing or sub particle accelerations.

But the fact of the matter still remains, that for the geophysical survey team in United States to say that these tectonic plate movements are not connected or related, is for them basically to be lying.  Because we already have a statement by NASA as a week ago explaining that the potentiality of a potential increase in the tilt of the Earth’s axis, very well may have taken place as a result of the Chile earthquake.  And of course anyone who understands the nature of the electromagnetic fields surrounding the Earth as well as the fields that run along the surface of your, when any kind of an increase or decrease in the tilt of the Earth’s axis takes place, this is usually indicative of something else that is either in the process of taking place or that is about to take place.  Furthermore, for the national geophysical survey came to dare to say that the tectonic plate movements throughout the planet are not connected or not related is for them to say that the tectonic plates themselves are really connected as a result of residing on top of the semi permeable, and semi liquid crust of the Earth.  And yet we know that the crust underneath these plates is semi permeable and semi liquid and thereby as a result does in fact connected and give connectivity to the various tectonic plate movements throughout the entire planet.  And so far, by my count, that shows pretty much that the national geophysical survey team has lied three different times regarding tectonic plate movements pursuant to the current level of earthquake activity throughout the entire planet

As I’ve said before, understanding Newtonian metaphysics theory and quantum physics theory and quantum mechanics is not something usually that the people at the geophysical survey team normally get involved with and the reason I know that is because I used to know a lot of the people who are part of that team when I was younger.  So I know exactly what they have studied and what they have not studied.  Furthermore, I have been in conversation with some actual quantum physicists, and a couple of quantum mechanics scientists regarding this very subject.  And while they have already said what I have explained above, that the Pauli theory is not one that is highly regarded because of the multidimensionality of the sub particle activity, they do concede that the multidimensionality of Pauli’s thesis very well may in fact be applicable pursuant to current tectonic plate movement as it is in fact being extrapolated, and/or demonstrated throughout the planet.

It is also necessary for people who are involved in the anti-global warming movement to understand that the more the people here on Earth argue about global warming and the more the people try to push their own egos out in front of them selves in order to make himself look more the less time that humanity will in fact have at being able to do anything about global warming, such as workout methods of survival.  It doesn’t really matter to me whether anyone believes what I’m saying or not I know exactly what’s going on throughout this planet with regard to the sub particle activity pursuant to electromagnetic field degeneration and deterioration and as the electromagnetic field interrelationship and interactions that are taking place, relate to the tectonic plate movements.  And I know what I’m talking about, because I’ve been studying this are 40 years.  No one studies anything for 40 years without getting somewhat good at it, unless they’re complete moron.  And I am not a moron

So again, it’s completely irresponsible for the national geophysical survey team in the United States to claim that tectonic plate movements are not in fact related when in reality, we know that they are related to the fact that material just underneath the crust of the Earth is in fact semi permeable and semi like what which in fact means that these tectonic plate movements are in fact interacting with each other as a result of residing on the same semi permeable, and/or semi liquid substance which is in fact the molten aspect of the Earth’s crust.  Furthermore, it needs to be understood that underneath the crust of the Earth there are many different electromagnetic fields.  According to some quantum physicists and some experts and quantum mechanics and Earth sciences, there are upwards of 4500 different electromagnetic fields underneath the crust of the Earth.  But that these fields actually are codified in groups of perhaps 100 different levels of electromagnetic field due to their density and speed of their particles within the various electromagnetic fields.  And, as I’ve already explained, there is more than enough indication at this point to give a great deal of credence and veracity to the potentiality of electromagnetic field degeneration, and/or deterioration.  And this is not to be confused with any slowing of the core which is not in fact taking place.  Although, the core is slowing down but that is simply due to nothing more than the age of the Earth.  Very little of anything going on with the speed of the core is being done by humans.  However, the deterioration, and/or degeneration, potentially, or so and to the electromagnetic fields under the crust of the Earth, very well may in fact be taking place, to some extent, as a result of human interaction pursuant to the various things that we humans are doing to the Earth’s crust.

The tectonic plate movements such as the one in Chile and the other very significant ones that happened since then are not only as a result of electromagnetic field pressure differences within those Pacific regions, but also changes in the density and the speed of the particles within those fields as a result of those tectonic plate movements.  And as a result of those movements of course changes in the entire overall structure of the crust of the Earth in that section of the planet is of course changed.  And that change of course precipitates changes throughout the entire crust of the Earth in the entire section of the planet surrounding the area where the actual earthquake took place.  And of course because the semi permeable, and/or semi fluid material underneath the crust of the Earth connects all the plates together, we’re looking at the potentiality of the earthquake in one region of the planet of course sending you reverberation or having a reverberating effect, in other sections of the planet which in fact has been proved a number of times by volcanologists and earthquake specialists

The reason that the national geophysical survey team is putting out the standard press release that they are because they’re trying to do everything possible to keep humanity from panicking.  Because humanity is prone to panicking.  And the last thing that we as a human race at this particular moment in time need is for us to panic or to become hysterical regarding what is taking place here on the Earth.  As I’ve continually tried to explain it doesn’t make any sense for humanity to become stupid and hysterical regarding the fact that we as a human population had acted very badly regarding our custodianship of this world.  But that’s exactly what we have done we have behaved in a terrible and extremely irresponsible manner with regard to our stewardship of this planet.  Because as I’ve already explained while 30 to 40% of any potential global warming process that very well may in fact be taking place is as a result of simply the Earth getting older.  60 to 70% of whatever potential global warming process that may in fact be taking place is a direct result of what we humans have done here on Earth as a result of our interaction with each other and our interaction with this planet.  For us to continue to behave in a responsible manner and extremely selfish which is exactly what we’re currently doing, is not only the height of absurdity is extremely stupid given the fact that there is actual physical evidence of the generation pursuant to the ecological system in which we survive.

It’s like I’ve said before the only thing that anyone has to lose here by continuing to argue about global warming into scream and yell about how they know more about what’s going on than anyone else and that everything regarding global warming is just bull,  is something very simple, all you have to lose by continuing to deny that global warming is taking place is your lives.  And if that’s what you really want to do that problem because the reality is it’s going to be you who are going to end up suffering with all of this not anyone else

The following is a mini-essay I wrote a while ago, for no particular reason. Reposted from my old blog attempt here.

The quality of writing is pretty poor in my opinion but hey, I never claimed to be a novelist. Hopefully the point still comes across clearly enough that people need to be better informed about the current world energy situation and the true cost/benefit balance of nuclear power.

Nuclear Negativity

Anyone with access to a television or the Internet recently will probably be fully aware of the possible nuclear weapons threat posed by North Korea. Even at the best of times the issues surrounding the safety of nuclear power, and the potential consequences of nuclear weapons proliferation, are hotly debated. Recent events could be seen by many as sure-fire evidence for why we, as a species, need to move away from this dangerous technology as quickly as possible. Is this really the most productive attitude to take, or are North Korea’s actions just an unfortunate catalyst to encourage fear-mongering about an important and misunderstood technology?

The control of nuclear weapons and enrichment processes is a serious problem for the worlds governments to face, but one which should be decoupled from the issue of nuclear power generation at any opportunity. It is an unfortunate truth that nuclear weapons are here to stay – even with anti-proliferation treaties the knowledge to create a nuclear weapon will remain in existence and will be almost impossible to remove, and rightly so. It seems obscene that the potential for violence in a few should force the collective to accept ignorance of technology which could ultimately prove extremely useful. After all, even if any knowledge of nuclear weapons was expunged from all of humanity, it would be a simple matter for many trained physicists to re-invent it from concepts which are now taught all the way down to secondary school level. Instead, steps should be taken simply to encourage cooperation and some form of centralised control over the enrichment process wherever it takes place. This is where the challenges arise, but simply dismissing all nuclear technology because of an already present threat is misguided. Nuclear weapons will not become significantly more or less deadly if nuclear power is shunned on principle.

The issue of radioactive waste and how to deal with it is one which requires proper scientific attention, rather than just discussion. At current the implementation of waste storage seems to let down what appears to be an otherwise well thought out system, but a number of potential solutions mostly involving burying the waste seem to be sensible as long as it is clearly explained that these waste burial sites will not simply be scattered around the countryside. The effects of a nuclear power plant and its waste are more than likely to be the number one concern for local residents when they discover that a reactor is being planned for a nearby area. The simple fact that most of the population have a minimal physics theory education makes them easy targets for a media obsessed with sensationalism, so any reports of radioactive particles being released into the air and stockpiles of unsafe material are certain to cause much more panic than is justifiable. These stories are designed to provoke an angry or fearful emotional response which overrides any concerns the reader might have over the evidence supporting such claims, but a reasoned and balanced assessment of the situation should leave local people with the feeling that the risks are minimised, and no greater than they face if the problem of global climatic change is not dealt with appropriately.

It is plain to see that nuclear power is one of the few methods of energy generation currently available to us which can meet our goals of reducing global emissions, at least in the short term. While not a truly renewable power source, the fuels for nuclear fission are available in suitable quantities to smooth the transition to a renewable-centred energy system based on next generation solar, wind and tidal power sources. Currently, these methods simply cannot meet the worlds energy requirements without some major economic and environmental consequences, as exemplified by the ongoing debate over the proposed Severn Barrage. In a time of economic uncertainty, it is reasonable to assume that proven methods will be preferred over others which may have expensive teething problems waiting for us. These issues will of course be dealt with in time, but the best way around those with a Bush-era attitude is with constant, unquestionable improvements – slow and steady wins the race.

Future advances in nuclear technology could provide a much more long-term solution to the problem of clean energy generation. While useful nuclear fusion is still a way off, embracing traditional nuclear power on a limited scale for the meantime also provides a useful PR stepping-stone towards having permanent nuclear fusion as and when it becomes available, should the challenges posed by the main renewables prove greater than anticipated. Some critics of this approach may argue that funds spent on fusion research could instead be used to quicken the widespread adoption of renewables, but this is in no way certain. Fusion research has been ongoing for many years, and physicists have isolated a small number of possible routes to fusion power to be explored further. For renewables the research effort is much more diffuse and in many cases less mature, allowing for the possibility of much of the investment to be wasted following dead-end routes. Hedging our bets and attempting to develop fusion technology while maintaining investment in efficient and reliable renewables seems to be the trade-off that will be necessary to ensure that, at some point in the future, we will have truly clean energy. Ignoring the nuclear option may not prevent the ultimate achievement of this goal – but it could well stall our progress and waste time we simply cannot afford to lose.

You are made up of energy spheres, resonances that help define what you manifest in your reality.

The first thing we need to talk about is resonance. A resonance within you is a frequency with a certain signature to it – a title if you will, which vibrates within your field of consciousness. A resonance can be simple along the lines of a preference for a certain food, or complex, the resonance combination that attracts your mate to you. Individual resonances combine to create more complex resonances; a preference for a food you only eat with your mate. Resonances combine in an infinite number of ways, in infinite complexity. Vibrating energy within you, each with a signature to it, is what makes up the personality that is you, and in turn your reality. In our image we can see resonance as energy spheres, each with a signature or title, each contained within the larger you, each influencing your reality.

The resonances we are referring to are very similar to musical tones and we can use an expanded understanding of a musical note expression to illuminate the concept of personal resonance and what resonance does. When a “E” string on a piano is struck, all of the other “E” strings vibrate imperceptibly in harmony. They must, as there is a harmonic resonance between them. Many people see this as “Like Attracts Like” but this isn’t entirely accurate. A hamburger sitting on your counter is not attracting more hamburgers, is it? The hamburger has no energy source to attract more hamburgers to it, as such, like does not always attract like. The piano string on the other hand has energy applied to it, by a catalyst – the hammer, that vibrates the string and therefore creates the resonant vibration in all strings of the same tone. The harder the hammer hits, the more the companion strings vibrate.

So, more accurately, resonance attracts a corresponding resonance as long as the resonance vibrates with enough intensity. The manifestation of a hamburger is based on an energized projection of a certain inner frequency(s) within the intended consumer, which then manifests the reality. To simplify, think of a tone within you creating an image in front of you: an inner hamburger tone, rattling strong enough and with enough energy, creates a hamburger via a common way to manifest it – buy one. If the hamburger tone is stronger than the hot-dog tone, the hamburger is the manifested food.

Musical Notes and Their Visual Translation

Below we can see how an audible musical note creates another corresponding manifested physical form. We observe this through the process of translating sound frequencies to physical images via cymatics. Below we see the energy created by a vibrating piano string translated into a physical image.

In the photos above: C2 represents a “cymatic” style physical expression of a vibrating C2 note on a piano. Image E2 is an E2 on a piano, with C2+E2 being the two combined (notice they are not overlays of the two, but a new form). We can see a “simple” tonal expression (C2) added to a second “simple” resonance (E2) gives us a more complex structure. The last image is a snapshot of a moment in Beethoven’s 9th Symphony; a very complex expression of tonal resonance as seen in physical form through the cymatic translation process.

Why is this important? We can look at our cymatic translation of one resonance – sound, to another – visual, as an excellent metaphor for what is happening to us. A resonance within us, triggered in some way to vibrate, (like the hammering of a piano string triggers the E2 to sound), is sending out a signal, which is intended to find a matching external image to interact with. When emanating from you, frequency vibrations actually create the reality you see in front of you by drawing things to you. The resonance resides within you, the power source resides within you, the activation stimulus is perceived to be external but it is actually within you too – your reality is a reflection of all of that:
Inner Frequency Resonance + Inner Activation + Inner Energy = Material Reality.

Material Reality

Everything single thing in your material reality is there because you have a resonance, a vibration, for it. Your home, your car, your job, your mate, your shoes, are all in your reality because you projected an inner resonance into your outer reality. Think of yourself as the projector in the movie theater. Your energy is the light that powers (illuminates) the film, the film is your resonance (frequencies you express), the screen image is your reality (the interactions designed to help you evolve).

Resonances within create the reality you interact with.
Continuing with our projector analogy, where does the ”resonance” on the film originate from? The resonances you project into your reality have many origins, some are consciously acquired, some are learned and some chosen. Many are acquired via mechanisms beyond the five sensory input systems. The world you live in suggests them to you: TV, Radio, Family, Friends, Religious Beliefs all contribute resonances that may, or may not, manifest in your reality. Some resonances come from the collective consciousness, even ancestors you have never met can add a vibe here and there, and some come from places as mysterious as your DNA and the celestial bodies.

Some of the resonances that created your reality have been laid out by Soul, You, as a result of your personal evolutionary process. In short, they come from everywhere – you have spent your entire life shopping for resonances to manifest – many of them conflicting resonances. As a result of some reckless purchasing, your consciousness has been trying to sort through the resonance clutter to manifest things consistent with an efficient personal growth process – Knowing that All Is One. Resonance conflict often creates an inefficient growth process, two or more resonances competing for manifestation (which college to attend, to break up with your mate or not). Whether or not you manifest a particular resonance is a complicated matter. Suffice it to say, if anything has manifested in your reality, you have a resonance for it and you are manifesting it. If you are manifesting something, you can control your effort (to a degree which we will cover later) but only when you fully understand the equation: Everything, no matter how pleasurable, good, odd or bad, is being manifested, by you, because you have an internal resonance for it and you are applying energy to that resonance in order to make it “manifest” as a reality for you to interact with.

Your reality is a perfectly mirrored reflection of your inner resonances. In our projector analogy, the odds of changing the image on the screen by attacking the image itself are zero – you cannot change what is projected after it has been projected. You cannot change your “physical” reality from the outside anymore than you can change the image on the screen without changing the film in the projector. Yet, when you stop and see our equation properly, you can turn around and adjust the resonance that resides within you, on the film contained in the projector, and change the image – actually change your reality!

Inner Conflict With the Concept

The inner conflict arising in you now is the belief that you have indeed altered your realty from the outside. One may say that cutting your hair is altering your reality from the outside. This is inaccurate, the resonance to need a haircut at all is one installed within you, most likely in childhood. The standard place to execute that resonance is a professional hairdresser – another resonance within, and the desire to execute a new cut or repeat the same cut, is also a resonance contained within you. All of those resonances have come together to manifest an aspect of you to cut your hair and it is you that is activating all of them when you determine a cut is needed. The hairdresser you have chosen is one who you have a resonance for; you chose this one as opposed to the thousands of others. Energy is applied to all of those resonances, and many others, to manifest the haircut in your reality. The actual haircut is the last part of this equation. The Harmonizing Statement Process will show you that even the hairdresser is indeed you.

It should be said at this point, you have a resonance for this particular technique, as you are here.

Resonance is what creates reality.

**********************

Meditate for a moment on the idea that everything in your reality is there because you have an internal resonance for it – everything.

Inner Frequency Resonance + Inner Activation + Inner Energy = Material Reality.

http://harmonizingstatements.com/page2/page2.html

^ Words: Michael Frayn

> Listen: Drum Gets A Glimpse

v Look: Library of Dust

I just read in the my alumni magazine that a team of UVA physicists have long been members of the Large Hadron Collider project, which recorded its first collision of proton beams in November ‘09. i saw the Science Channel’s documentary on the build of this proton collison machine, and it is massive–in size, expense, and human effort. The amount of human ingenuity and brain power being put to the task of making this machine and designing experiments that hope to do no less than delve into the basic structure of matter and the origin of our universe, is just, well, in my view, a beautiful thing. Like the inventors of mathematics, these people make me proud to be a human and an a graduate of the University.

Am ajuns la stadiul in care se rade de mine pentru ca invat! Asa ceva n-am pomenit. Dupa ce ca de cand am intrat la liceu nu m-am straduit absolut deloc, toata lumea se astepta sa decad intr-un asemenea hal incat sa nu mai revin pe linia de plutire, acum ca invat si eu la cateva materii, se pare ca unii interpreteaza asta intr-un mod comic.

Sa fie clar: invat unde, cand, cum am eu chef. Eh aveam chef de niste grile dintr-o varianta, ma plictiseam, asa ca m-am apucat sa le fac. Evident a trebuit sa fie cineva care sa observe si sa comenteze. Nu inteleg, cand cineva are chef de o activitate decenta intr-un spatiu public, de ce sa te iei de el? Nu trageam pe nas, nu fumam nimic ilegal, nu ma dezbracam si nu injuram pe nimeni. Invatam ceva folositor. Dar nuuuuu, pe lumea asta nu exista situatia in care as fi fost lasata in pace pe veci in legatura cu faza asta. Trebuia fi folosita impotriva mea, altfel nu se poate. Asa ca se rade de mine ca invat ceva. Pe mine ma amuza teribil, dar, a se intelege, nu ma afecteaza cu absolut nimic. Tot ce vreau fac. Si am sa fac in continuare variante oriunde si oricand mi se nazare, nu ma intereseaza cine si ce comenteaza si ce “aluzii” se fac la chestia asta. La urma urmei cineva tre’ sa invete pe lumea asta ca sa ajunga sa faca ceva pentru altii, nu? Zic si eu…