Phasing

HAARP and WiFi from Light Bulbs, Tesla Technology

     

Nicola Tesla Wireless Light Bulb

Nicola Tesla may be dead, but his technology lives on with the latest news that will allow you to make an Internet connection with a light bulb!    

A bright idea coming out of Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute could change the way we connect to the Internet in the future, as well as drive the nascent market for interior LED lighting. Researchers there have found a way to encode a visible-frequency wireless signal in the light coming from lamps and fixtures, turning the light that surrounds us into a high-speed broadband source….In the lab the Fraunhofer team has downloaded data at a rate of 230 megabits per second, a record for visible wireless using commercial LEDs and comparable to high-end radio wireless connections. http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-03/future-wireless-web-beaming-signals-desk-lamps-light-fixtures 

Nikola Tesla (10 July 1856 – 7 January 1943) was an inventor and a mechanical  and electrical engineer. He was one of the most important contributors to the birth of commercial electricity, and is best known for his many revolutionary developments in the field of electromagnetism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  (WIKI)  

Besides inventing a wireless light bulb, Tesla is believed to have held upwards of 1,500 patents of which some 270 are accounted for or remain classified.  Many of his achievements are still attributed to contemporaries Thomas Edison, Guglielmo Marconi and later to Bernard J. Eastlund the original patent holder for HAARP.

Patent Number:     4,686,605
Date of Patent: Aug. 11, 1987
Inventor Eastlund, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE http://www.skepticfiles.org/mys3/hrpatent.htm  Is this the patent that holds the key to what is causing so many earthquakes?

Eastland’s patent that resulted in HAARP research, bears a remarkable resemblance to some of Tesla’s patents including  U.S. Patent 568178 (G.patent; PDF) – Method of Regulating Apparatus for Producing Electric Currents of High Frequency – 1896 September 22 – Cited by Tesla in “the True Wireless” (illustrated in that article as Fig. 10) in the wireless field for the concatenated tuned circuits; regulates the energy delivered by a system for the production of high-frequency currents and comprising of a supply-side circuit whose current is diverted into a charging circuit of high self-induction.  For some unknown reason- the US patent office has deleted the full text and images but the pdf link works http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat568178.pdf.

Other Tesla  inventions and developments included the induction motor, the bifilar coil, various devices that use rotating magnetic fields, the alternating current polyphase power distribution system, the fundamental devices of systems of wireless communication (legal priority for the invention of radio), radio frequency oscillators, devices for voltage magnification by standing wave mechanicss, robotics, logic gates for secure radio frequency communications, devices for x-rays, devices for ionized gases, devices for high field emission, devices for charged particle beams, methods for providing extremely low level of resistance to the passage of electrical current., means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations, voltage multiplication circuitry, devices for high voltage discharges, devices for lightning protection, the bladeless turbine, and VTOL aircraft. via pure energy systems -wiki, peswiki.     

It could be said that Tesla invented the 20th century or at the very least spurred on scientific advances previously unheard of that we now take for granted- electricity and the radio for example.    

Did Tesla envision cable vision and cable tv before it existed in U.S. Patent 514167 (G.patent; PDF) – Electrical Conductor – 1894 February 6- Prevent loss in line conductors; Insulate and encase conductors with a sheathing which is connected to the ground; Sheath or screen; Coaxial cabling.    

Does this patent sound like today’s cell phone technology? U.S. Patent 0,645,576 ^[5] – System of Transmission of Electrical Energy – 1900 March 20 – Commonly referred to as the radio patent; Related to wireless telegraphy; Wireless transmission of electric power

Did Tesla lay the ground work for Wifi through a light bulb with this patent?    U.S. Patent 454622 (G.patent; PDF) – System of Electric Lighting – 1891 June 23 – Apparatus devised for the purpose of converting and supplying electrical energy in a form suited for the production of certain novel electrical phenomena, which require currents of higher frequency and potential. It specifies an energy storage capacitor and discharger mechanism on the primary side of a radio-frequency transformer.    

Did Tesla invent the cell phone unwittingly- Does this patent sound like today’s cell phone technology? U.S. Patent 0,645,576^] – System of Transmission of Electrical Energy – 1900 March 20 – Commonly referred to as the radio patent; Related to wireless telegraphy; Wireless transmission of electric power?

 ”…when Nikola Tesla revealed to JP Morgan that his Wardenclyffe tower would not only transmit communications across the ocean, but would also enable wireless transmission of free electricity to any point on the planet, JP Morgan became livid and pulled the plug on the finances for the project.  Such a project was anathema to the sensibilities of Morgan who could not see how such a thing could be metered whereby he could become even more stinking wealthy than he already was, nor would it help him in his plans to help enslave the planet.http://www.examiner.com/x-8199-Breakthrough-Energy-Examiner~y2010m2d15-Nikola-Teslas-passing-in-Alphabetics-Bible-Code    

For all Tesla’s inventions he died nearly broke.  Today, Philips Lumileds Lighting Company(http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PHG ) is the world’s leading manufacturer of high-power LEDs.   Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)  is on its heels to become the largest. ATT & Verizon battle it out as leaders in communications.  All are valued in the billions.

Of course, mainstream science has never fully acknowledged Tesla’s contributions, and his later pronouncements (he vowed that he had developed a technology that could split the earth asunder) have left him straddling that familiar historical territory where genius meets crackpot. Not surprisingly, fringe science and conspiracy theory have made Tesla something of a patron saint. Whenever, talk radio buzz or Internet discussion turns to alleged government experiments to cause earthquakes or modify weather, references to government-suppressed “Tesla Technology” are sure to follow. http://www.haarp.net/haarpoverview.htm

“There is no thing endowed with life—from man, who is enslaving the elements, to the nimblest creature—in all this world that does not sway in its turn. Whenever action is born from force, though it be infinitesimal, the cosmic balance is upset and the universal motion results.”  Nikola Tesla

For more information visit the Tesla Memorial Society at  http://www.teslasociety.com/index.html  

        

Open wide, say ahhh and check out more posts from Ahrcanum!      

Our Swine Flu Report that began in April 2009 is at http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/swine-flu-report          

Shaking, rattling and rolling into the conspiracy, truth and science of EARTHQUAKES, HAARP, EISCAT, Tesla, etc., with more posts at http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/earthquakes-haarp/       

Help spread the word.  SUBSCRIBE  NOW and Follow us on Twitter (by clicking in the side margin) or sign up at http://twitter.com/ so you can get the latest updates as soon as they’re posted. Make sure to re-tweet, so all your friends get the heads up too.      

Universe to be shut down to address ‘fundamental design flaws’

Size matters to art

Self-organization of magnetoacoustic waves in a thermally unstable environment

Robert Chin, Erwin Verwichte, George Rowlands, and Valery M. Nakariakov<br/> The nonlinear evolution of magnetoacoustic wave mechanicss in a nonadiabatic plasma is investigated analytically. The effect of plasma activity due to linear and quadratic heating and radiative cooling on propagating magnetoacoustic wave mechanicss in a uniform plasma is considered. A nonlinear evolution equation is de … [Phys. Plasmas 17, 032107 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.

Resolving velocity space dynamics in continuum gyrokinetics

M. Barnes, W. Dorland, and T. Tatsuno<br/> Many plasmas of interest to the astrophysical and fusion communities are weakly collisional. In such plasmas, small scales can develop in the distribution of particle velocities, potentially affecting observable quantities such as turbulent fluxes. Consequently, it is necessary to monitor velocity s … [Phys. Plasmas 17, 032106 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.

Applied spectroscopy in pulsed power plasmas

G. A. Rochau, J. E. Bailey, and Y. Maron<br/> Applied spectroscopy is a powerful diagnostic tool for high energy density plasmas produced with modern pulsed power facilities. These facilities create unique plasma environments with a broad range of electron densities (1010 cm) and temperatures (1010 eV) immersed in strong magnetic (>100 T) an … [Phys. Plasmas 17, 055501 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.

Between Encouragement and a Dose of Reality

What do you do when someone very young, say a high school student, come up to you and eagerly tells you that he/she wants to be a string theorist? Or a particle physicist? Or a nuclear physicist? Etc… etc.. i.e. pick any “sexy” physics theory profession that you can think of right now. What do you do?

Do you continue to encourage that person, or do you try to do that carefully while injecting a dose of reality?

Here’s what I’ve written elsewhere on this matter, and I’ll copy it here verbatim, with added commentary afterward:

I cringe every time I read in here of kids still in high school, or barely starting college, who already either are focused on a particular career, or already made up their minds that on a particular, exact career that they want to do. Now don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with having an ambition and aiming to want to be something. However, one needs to step back a bit and figure out if the “choice” being made here was made based on having all the necessary information (i.e. a well-informed decision), or made entirely based on superficial perception.

There are two important issues here that should be addressed and considered.

(i) It is highly unlikely that an 18-year old knows extremely well what is involved in being, say, a theoretical astrophysicist. So how did someone like that arrived at the conclusion that that is what he/she wants to be? More often than not, this person saw some TV shows, or went to some facility, or read some news coverage, and over a period of time, “fell in love” with the idea of being a theoretical astrophysicist.

(ii) It is also very likely that this person hasn’t yet been exposed to ALL (or at least, a lot) of the exciting aspects of other field of studies. It is one thing to have seen all the “merchandise” and then make an informed selection, it is another to have only seen one or two and decided that those are sufficient to make a choice.

While there is nothing wrong with having a goal, there is a lot of things wrong when such a decision causes one to have blinders on and not even consider looking at other possibility. It is one of the reason why I conducted a non-scientific career poll on the physics theoryForums. I wanted to see how many here who actually ended up in the VERY exact field that he/she envisioned when he/she was that young. If you simply look at the results, you’ll see that only 15% of the poll participants ended up in the very exact career that they envisioned[*]! Significantly more of the participants end up doing roughly the same type of field of study, but not exactly the area of specialization that they had in mind.

What is the lesson in all of this? The lesson here is that, if you’re just starting out in your academic life, there’s a VERY good chance that you WILL NOT end up in the very exact specialization that you had in mind. That is a very important take-home message, and could be one of your first smack of reality. What this means is that you should NOT close the door on other subject areas just because you already have an ambition to be something. Just because you want to be a theoretical astrophysicist doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t at least look into solid state physics theory or read new discoveries coming out of atomic/molecular physics theory. There’s a good chance that you will not be a theoretical astrophysicist, and you need to prepare yourself for such a possibility. It is why I’ve always tried to emphasize an undergraduate education that is as WIDE-RANGING as possible. Want to be a theorist? Well, take that extra lab class anyway! You’ll never now that your ability to make that thin-film deposition might be the very skill that get you that job, or that graduate school admission. Idealism can only go so far before financial reality steps in and smack you on your face.

[*] I am still skeptical of this number, and so far, only one participants have given an explanation on his selection. I think this number might be even significantly lower than what we end up with. I am guessing that many didn’t actually read the full options posted in the first message of the poll. Of all the physicists that I’ve chatted with, I don’t ever remember even one of them telling me that they are doing what they had in mind exactly when they were 17/18 years of age.

The fine line that I would walk here is to not discourage someone that young so that he/she continues to nurture that interest in physics theory. But the reality is that, there is a strong possibility that he/she would NOT go into such fields. physics theory is such a wide subject area, and the less glamorous ones are often the ones that (i) have a larger chance of employment (ii) has more funding (iii) wider and larger number of opportunities. In many of my contacts with high school students, I think when the opportunity arise, I try to convey this view that physics theory is more than just the LHC or string theory. It is also the iPod and the silicon chips and the laser and the MRI. I can only hope that somehow, those blinders would start falling and they could see a wider horizon.

Zz.

A new particle interaction mixing model for turbulent dispersion and turbulent reactive flows

Daniel W. Meyer<br/> Probability density function (PDF) methods are an established tool applied for the simulation of turbulent mixing and turbulent reactive flows. Mixing models are required to close the molecular diffusion term in the PDF transport equation. From the nature of molecular diffusion, several requirements … [Phys. Fluids 22, 035103 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.

Site of incorporation and solubility for Fe ions in acceptor-doped PZT ceramics

E. Erdem, R.-A. Eichel, Cs. Fetzer, I. Dezsi, S. Lauterbach et al.<br/> Pb(ZrTi)O ceramic samples with composition near the morphotropic phase boundary have been investigated. Samples have been nominally doped with 0.5 and 1.0 mol % Fe atoms and studied by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Mossbauer spectroscopy. EPR and … [J. Appl. Phys. 107, 054109 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.

Optical properties of a high-temperature superconductor operating in near zero-permittivity region

Heng-Tung Hsu, Fang-Yao Kuo, and Chien-Jang Wu<br/> Optical properties of a high-temperature superconductor in the near-zero-permittivity operation range are theoretically investigated. Investigations are performed through the calculations of optical reflectance over three model structures. First, the calculated wave mechanicslength-dependent reflectance for a … [J. Appl. Phys. 107, 053912 (2010)] published Thu Mar 11, 2010.